Добрый день !
Тема уже обсуждалась, почитайте пожалуйста, здесь :
http://forums.naimaudio.com/topic/spendo...6901376978
если вкратце :
creek and audio research are the best from what we had for the harbeths
naim and the
moon for the spendors
I guess you are talking about the
Exposure (2010s)? They have been revamped quite bit recently. I had a Creek Evo briefly as a stopgap in a second system and it was neither bad nor good for an entry level integrated. I certainly much preferred an
Onix 21. The Destiny is a different matter though, and then when I heard the Destiny 2 recently I was very impressed indeed - this was through B&W CM9 and I was surprised how lush a midrange the Destiny could put out, considering its reputation for leanness and clarity. The Exposure Classic 23/28 I heard once and it sounded mostly good. I threw quite a bit of music at it and the only negative was that it was harshly revealing on a live performance of Brahms 4th ( the Bernstein one). The speakers were
Monopulse 42a and I don't know which part of the system was responsible - it may have just been the room. I should stress that mostly it was a convincing system.
Exposure 23/28 against
Naim 202/200/Napsc against the much cheaper
Creek Destiny 2 - that would be an interesting bake-off.
Then i got the Spendor S3/5r2 on home demo for a week which worked amazingly good with the exposure and even better with Naim . Here i should note that i agree with your views of Exposure presentation compared to Naim is harder and musical flow is more smooth with Naim . However both the amps paired well with Spendors compared to other brands.
So overall i Liked the spendors and purchased a s5es for more bass presence. This time I had only exposure to drive it , it was good tonally but bass was uncontrolled due to the lower power capability of the amp ( 75 watts – 2010S2)
Вопрос : какой размер Вашей комнаты ?
Есть ли минимальная акустическая обработка помещения ?