(21-11-2015 19:12)janikol писал(а): на двух нотах
так более правильно
однозначно в цитатник форума
Если запитать от дохлого усилка -таки да.
Я дома слушаю на акустике в которй в открытом оформлении 18"+8" на низах,а на работе-на обычных Клипшах с 2х8" в ФИ.
И там и там басовых нот больше двух(я постараюсь посчитать,обеСчаю!)
(21-11-2015 21:59)Cox. писал(а): Динаудио просто представитель концепта Динамиков и вообще АС. Которые не продвигались в Акустике 70-х 80-х. В том числе и топовой.
Неужели тогда люди (аки Фирмы) были тупее со своими Институтами Аудио. Не делая тупую акустику.
Знаете,Сох,когда я писал о "недавних детях"-я имел в виду именно вас.
Конечно,вам простительно писать такие благоглупости,вас же тогда на свете не было.Но не обижайтесь,меня тоже.
Так я вам скажу по секрету,что первую тупую колонку создали в 1954 г Эдгар Вилчур и Генри Клосс,и называлас она Акустик РесерчЬ АР-1
Acoustic suspension loudspeaker
The acoustic suspension woofer provided an elegant solution to the age-old problem of bass distortion in loudspeakers caused by non-linear, mechanical suspensions in conventional loudspeakers. The acoustic suspension woofer (sometimes known as “air suspension”) used the elasticity of air within a small, sealed enclosure of about 1.7 cu ft (48 L) to provide the restoring force for the woofer cone. The entrapped air of the sealed-loudspeaker enclosure -— unlike the mechanical springs of conventional speakers—provided an (almost) linear spring for the woofer's diaphragm, enabling it to move back and forth great distances (“excursion”) in a linear fashion, a requirement in the reproduction of deep bass tones. The disadvantage of this arrangement is low efficiency; since the restoring force is large with a large woofer in a small cabinet, the cone must be massive to keep the resonant frequency in the required low bass region. The AR-1s were about a factor of 10 less efficient than other (physically much larger) existing speakers with the same bass response,[2] but since higher power amplifiers were becoming available about the same time, this was a reasonable trade-off to get good bass response from a relatively small speaker.
As such, the AR-1 set new standards of low-frequency performance and low distortion that were unsurpassed for many years; in fact, some of the best loudspeakers available fifty-two years later continue to use the acoustic suspension principle for highest quality, low distortion bass reproduction. The small size of the high performance AR-1 (permitted by the acoustic suspension design) was a dividend that helped usher in the age of stereophonic sound reproduction. Two bookshelf-sized loudspeakers were far more acceptable in a living room than the two refrigerator-sized boxes previously necessary to reproduce low frequency bass notes.
